tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post797908122342856345..comments2022-11-03T05:43:58.441+13:00Comments on Save our butts: Judgment of High Court on interim ordersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-30931594290193519212009-08-06T09:51:51.250+12:002009-08-06T09:51:51.250+12:00Id like to see that $60,0000 of public money spent...Id like to see that $60,0000 of public money spent donated to the NSA to re-imburse the legal fees.Pistol Shooternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-68833064051386463152009-08-05T22:15:52.803+12:002009-08-05T22:15:52.803+12:00I wouldnt take it too seriously. All their doing i...I wouldnt take it too seriously. All their doing is antagonising and making 240,000 people more determined to fight them tooth and nail... if they want to advertise that... good luck to them.Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12603609941860619418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-91013948737539927672009-08-05T22:09:53.594+12:002009-08-05T22:09:53.594+12:00If those particular string pullers in the Police h...If those particular string pullers in the Police had even a fragment of common decency or respect for tax payers and tax payers money they would not commence burning away our money on advertising before this matter is finalised. If they continue down this untenable path not only will they waste tax payer money in advertising they will waste money in having to re-advertise in the reverse when they are found wrong + pay out well deserved damages. This whole situation makes my blood boil.Grantnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-72064130890942178542009-08-05T22:00:06.212+12:002009-08-05T22:00:06.212+12:00I think said hypothetical besieged dealer would pr...I think said hypothetical besieged dealer would probably be rubbing his hands together... more from the prospect of being able to sue for damages than any particularily cold canterbury day ... ha ha ha.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-85053597798809402002009-08-05T21:55:30.918+12:002009-08-05T21:55:30.918+12:00It seems quite possible that top-plod may target a...It seems quite possible that top-plod may target a dealer who is not subservient to their unlawful definitions and dictates and try to financially destroy the dealer with specious court actions. If said plod do this it I hope it would galvanize all shooters to forward funds of support to the besieged dealer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-73886760721779164572009-08-05T21:45:44.058+12:002009-08-05T21:45:44.058+12:00This outcome = confusion. Basically if impending ...This outcome = confusion. Basically if impending police re-interpretation is to be treated as merely the inconsequential opinion it is and if the status quo is also described the same way then I can see firearm commerce is going to be a right mess.<br /><br />Oh well, we were going to have a court case anyway regardless of whether or not an injunction was issued, and if the August 10 re-interpretation is to be discounted by the judge as not being worth the paper its written on then we, and businesses, should be able to do as we please. <br /><br />In my opinion this outcome can be treated as an injunction anyway (which you've basically implied).Grantnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-69760845501543703442009-08-05T21:37:20.190+12:002009-08-05T21:37:20.190+12:00I couldnt possibly commentI couldnt possibly commentRichardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12603609941860619418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-50839288501965948762009-08-05T21:34:35.586+12:002009-08-05T21:34:35.586+12:00But thats like enforcing laws that are different t...But thats like enforcing laws that are different to the real laws. Isn't that what the Taliban are doing in Pakistan ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-20959223154499142992009-08-05T21:24:08.461+12:002009-08-05T21:24:08.461+12:00In answer to question 1 - YES
In answer to questio...In answer to question 1 - YES<br />In answer to question 2 - The legal situation in regard to your thumbhole stock has not changed since 1st November 1992.<br /><br />Analogy. Theres a speed restriction sign on your street that says 50KPH. The Police leave a notice in your letter box saying that they think people are going down your street to fast. Therefore because the purpose of the Land Transport Act is prevent speeding accidents, they are going to apply a "purposive interpretation" of the act and ticket anyone who exceeds 30KPH. You can politely raise your central index finger in a northward direction... or you can comply by driving at 30KPH. Your choice ....Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12603609941860619418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717565192208399747.post-38481779605109300192009-08-05T20:16:39.448+12:002009-08-05T20:16:39.448+12:00so does this mean that the new Interpretation has ...so does this mean that the new Interpretation has no legal basis ?<br /><br />Are we free to continue using our sporter thumbhole stocks ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com